A MUSEUM RESTAURANT
When we go to a restaurant, let's be honest, do we really want it to about the food? The Lucca Center of Contemporary Art started out life as merely a museum, picking up a few touring shows including a very good one of Dubuffet. It's current offering is photography by David LaChapelle.
But recently the museum decided to be a restaurant as well. Where once there had been merely an entry hall and reception/ticket desk there is now a chef, a charming one—that's him peeking out, Cristiano Tomei, and his most extraordinary restaurant is called L'Imbuto.
Cristiano recommended this wonderful Riesling for lunch on a hot September day, and we very much appreciated its low alcohol and zingy zest—zesty zing?!
There is a movement afoot of art and science in the kitchen. It's been around for a while—among its earliest practitioners being
Ferran Adrià of El Buli in Spain. I'm one of those who feel that his singular contribution to European haute cusine has made a total mess of fine dining on this continent. In the 1970s and on into the 80s great restaurants in Europe, especially in France, were memorably enjoyable, the pleasures of quality and elegance abounding. I regret to say that all this came to an abrupt end about ten years ago when Adrià's gastronomic science and casual Fridays caught on. That said, this artfully produced dish above, a "marshmallow" of scampi with a confection of Parmigiano in Malaga was quite good. To produce it, however, you need a kitchen that resembles Frankenstein's laboratory with its bubbling tubes of polystyrene, copolymers, and polypropylene in perfectly clear and high impact plastics full of mounting viscous juices and their froth. Chefs today! It's a fine line between giving pleasure and grossing you out!

I very much liked this "fish & chips," as Cristiano called it, a new twist on fish sticks in a potato crust with a sauce of Tuscan savory bread pudding and a parsley foam.
The potato crust takes four days to make—it's like paper before it's cooked.
But things went downhill for me here. This, above, was described as a "risotto non risotto," as there was no rice in the dish at all. I'm not sure I've got it right, but the glutinous liquid from the heads of shrimps was used to thicken this vegetable concoction so that it had a risotto-like starchy thickness. The rest of the shrimps was used to make the shrimp ball sitting on top. Instead of salt, dried Tuscan
cavolo nero was ground up to make a salty powder. The idea is huge, I suppose you could say, and the man is an artist, a master chef, but I didn't appreciate the sliminess of the end result nor the strange cabbage aftertaste. The Philistine in me would have preferred a bigger dish with, say six or seven of these balls on it and forget the stuff underneath.
This was a sort of homage to Cristiano's father's homeland of Friuli, where many of Italy's apples are grown. The
agnolotti are filled with apple and they're served in a fish sauce with onions and chopped oysters.
Home made spaghetti served here with a seafood sauce—and the unthinkable in Italy: Parmigiano on fish. There was something else daring about this dish, but I don't remember what.
A foamy desert! I forget.
This is where we sat.
I loved the wine!
This was a hit!
This apple thing had a rather unsatisfying taste of fermentation to it, like cider brewing—not what I would have wanted to find. Cristiano, bless his heart.

A pudding topped with shaved chocolate and served in a mini flowerpot had its charm. But I want to discuss the problem I have with all this if I may—and this is not an indictment against L'Imbuto, which is a very impressive and valid effort indeed. The best restaurants once succeeded in giving you the utmost satisfaction with memorable, delicious food served with style and quality. Back then if a restaurant had a star or three you could count on having a good dinner. These days I avoid "starred" restaurants at all cost—we're headed to Paris later in the week and I've already made our reservations and there isn't a single starred restaurant among them. And now there's a new crop of "gastronomic" restaurants out there that people seem to flock to. Paris has dozens, Le Chateaubriand, Claude Colliot, Pirouette, etc. Le Chateaubriand is so popular you have to stand out on the street for hours before they let you in, even with a reservation, and people do it. The food is like this stuff above, I imagine. I know the scene. No tablecloths. Set price. No menu. What comes out comes out. A New York Times article about Le Chateaubriand says that the chef "doesn't care if you like it or not." And who are the clients? They're usually young, he has a beard and curly hair, she, perhaps unawares, shows quite a lot of the wrong underpants above jeans which give her a "muffin top." They both carry backpacks which sit at their feel like a couple of well-behaved pugs. They take notes in a spiral notebook. They discuss each bite between themselves. They gangplank their knives and forks with conviction. They could be from anywhere. They're good kids. They're "foodies." But to get back to the thrust of my complaint, this kind of gastronomy has found its way even to restaurants with tablecloths, where you or I might eat, even to the world's "best" restaurants, and this is sad. You might remember that wonderful meal you once had at Le Baumaniere or Moulin de Mougins? Well preserve that memory as best you can because those days of eating coherently are gone! And what has taken its place you may ask? Oyster ice cream and
foie gras soup. When we go out to a restaurant, let's be honest, do we really want it to about the food? I'd appreciate your thoughts on this, thanks! And one other question, Are there restaurants like this outside of Europe?